The world's scientific and social network for malaria professionals
Subscribe to free Newsletter | 11068 malaria professionals are enjoying the free benefits of MalariaWorld today

Yes, malaria eradication was possible !

January 27, 2014 - 17:55 -- Pierre Lutgen

It was achieved in at least 10 countries after World War 2 : USA, Siberia, Turkey, Italy, Cuba, Spain, England, Sri Lanka; Algeria, Morocco…

DDT effective in eliminating malaria

Jasson Urbach | 23 Jan 2014 AFM

The Observer (Uganda)

It is hard to know where to begin in responding to Ellady Muyambi's piece, DDT is not our solution for malaria, that ran in The Observer of January 12, 2014. First, readers should understand that, contrary to Muyambi's quotation from a single US. physician, DDT was indeed a major factor in the rapid eradication of malaria once DDT was employed against it in the United States.

It is also a historical fact that DDT was singularly responsible for eradicating malaria from numerous countries, removing malaria as a threat for around one billion people. Muyambi's supposedly environmentally friendly methods have almost no record of success in the control of this disease. Second, Muyambi's statements about the human health effects of DDT are simply wrong. Decades of research have not proven DDT causes harm to human health.

Thus the World Health Organisation (WHO) continues to approve DDT for public health. This is why Muyambi is deliberately vague in describing DDT's human health harm. He raises the old scare tactic of DDT causing cancer. In fact, WHO lists it only as a possible carcinogen. The label of "possible carcinogen" applies to most chemicals and includes almost everything we eat.

Third, Muyambi highlights the successes against malaria in Mexico, Vietnam, and Kenya as arguments against DDT. He should understand that Mexico and Vietnam used DDT very effectively to control malaria in the past. They stopped using DDT because of environmentalist pressures and scare tactics and in each case abandoning DDT greatly increased malaria cases. But more to the point of Muyambi's inference about malaria eradication in these countries, he is factually wrong. All three countries still have worrisome malaria problems. It would be easy to dismiss Muyambi out of hand were his statements not so dangerous.

The reality is that activist campaigns against public health insecticides and against DDT in particular have cost millions of innocent lives and made global malaria control more difficult and expensive. Responsible Ugandans should, as the WHO has done, take a sober, objective look at the scientific evidence. This will inevitably result in support for the use of DDT against the deadly threat of malaria.