The world's scientific and social network for malaria professionals
Subscribe to free Newsletter | 10148 malaria professionals are enjoying the free benefits of MalariaWorld today

Malaria Elimination and Eradication: Starting as We Mean to Continue

October 30, 2009 - 09:36 -- Richard Feachem

The E words, Eradication and Elimination, are firmly back on the table after at least 2 decades in which they could not be mentioned in polite malaria company. The last two years have seen remarkable progress in translating these concepts into clear strategies and substantial action.

The broad multi-decade strategy for our journey to a world free of malaria is expressed in three parts:

  1. Aggressive control in the heartland, to achieve very low transmission and mortality in those tropical countries currently experiencing the highest burden of disease and death.


  2. Progressive elimination from the endemic margins to shrink the malaria map.


  3. Research to bring forward a vaccine and better drugs, diagnostics, insecticides and other tools.

The first and third of these strategic elements have been receiving considerable effort since the creation of the Global Fund in 2002, and the rapid rise in commitments by the Gates Foundation to malaria research and development at about the same time.  The second element, namely continuing the historical process of progressive spatial malaria elimination from the endemic margins inwards, has recently received needed attention through the work of the Global Health Group (GHG) at the University of California, San Francisco, and the Malaria Elimination Group (MEG) which the GHG convenes and supports.  This has been made possible by funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and ExxonMobil.  Progress to date in the elimination space can be characterized under the headings global, regional, and country. 

 

Global progress has been stimulated by the work of MEG, a group of 45 individuals from 18 countries.  MEG will meet for the fourth time in Hainan, China, during December, 2009.  MEG has produced two landmark publications:

  1. Shrinking the Malaria Map:  A Prospectus on Malaria Elimination 



  2. Shrinking the Malaria Map:  A Guide on Malaria Elimination for Policy Makers 

These publications (which can be found at MalariaEliminationGroup.Org) compile both existing and new evidence on the technical, financial, and operational feasibility of malaria elimination.  They are widely used and consulted in the 39 countries that are either embarked on elimination today or are seriously contemplating sub-national or national elimination goals. 

 

At the regional level, noteworthy progress includes the creation of the Elimination Eight (E8), under the chairmanship of Dr. Richard Kamwi, the Minister of Health of Namibia.  The E8 brings together the four front line eliminating countries in southern Africa ((Botswana, Namibia, South Africa, and Swaziland) and their four northern neighbors (Angola, Mozambique, Zambia, and Zimbabwe).   The E8 held its inaugural meeting in Windhoek in March, 2009, and is embarking on a program of effective technical and operational collaboration, with a particular focus on cross-border efforts. 

 

The second major regional initiative is the Asia Pacific Malaria Elimination Network (APMEN).  Announced by Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd at the UN General Assembly in September, 2008, APMEN had it inaugural meeting in Brisbane in February 2009.  It is collaboration among the 10 elimination countries in the Asia Pacific region:  Bhutan, China, DPRK, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Solomon Islands, ROK, Sri Lanka, and Vanuatu.  Australia has played a critical role in supporting this initiative.  Collaborative operational research and the sharing of experience will soon get underway, with a particular focus on P.vivax.  The second meeting of APMEN will be held in Kandy, Sri Lanka, in February, 2010. 

 

At the country level, there is significant progress taking place across all of the 39 elimination countries. These countries have adopted their elimination goals on the basis of their own assessments of feasibility.  In some cases, they are part of regional multi-country collaborations, while in others these are individual country efforts.  In all cases, cross-border collaboration with neighbors that are less advanced in malaria control is a critical element of success.

 

In summary, the journey to eradication, which will surely last 4 decades or more, has begun. Much more remains to be done.  Many challenges lie ahead. Science will continue to bring us new tools and approaches which, if boldly and vigorously applied, will ensure that we continue to maintain today’s strong momentum and to drive down malaria deaths and illness in all malarious countries, while simultaneously continuing to Shrink the Malaria Map.  

 

Professor Sir Richard Feachem

Director, Global Health Group
University of California, San Francisco
Chair, Malaria Elimination Group

 

 

 

Comments

Submitted by mary saison on

If we can't eradicate all mosquito's in areas like this, I may suggest you to pay arizona pest control a visit and experience their skills in controlling such pests.
Thank you for this need to know information regarding the spread of malaria and of the space.

William Jobin's picture
Submitted by William Jobin on

While it might appear that the call for eradication will bring out lots of enthusiasm, it is hard to see how we can mount a global program, based on fantasy.

And let's admit that the Gates and Clinton Foundations mean well but are divorced from reality, USAID and the PMI are mired in decades of bureaurocratic tangles, and the UN and WHO left the scene a long time ago, so the attack on malaria in Africa will progress as Africa progresses.

Realism will work better than fantasy.

Let's take Africa, where most malaria deaths occur. A realistic strategy would be to start in the stable, most democratic countries, and gradually develop competent national programs, employing nationals who live in the malaria zone, who can progress upward in their civil service by making progress against malaria in small and carefully measured increments.

So they would reduce malaria prev in school kids by 10% each year, at a cost within the national budget realities. That gives us a solid foundation for progress. Forget the magic bullets and fantasy. Malaria control takes careful application of proven methods - all of them - in a rational strategy that reflects budget realities as well as the ecology of malaria.

Start with the solid countries, where investments will not be wasted on some dictator and his cronies. Start with Senegal, Mali and Ghana. With Tanzania and Mozambique, Malawi, Zambia, Botswana and blessed South Africa. Grow those programs slowly and carefully. Use them as training grounds for folks around them who speak the same language. Realize that we are dealing with Arabic, English, French, Portuguese and Swahili.

Final note: I think it is the third law of for attacking malaria in Africa - The dictators are as dangerous as the mosquitoes.

Willy

William Jobin Director of Blue Nile Associates